Quitting Behavior is Social Too

When we talk about social networking or contagion effect, we are usually referring to getting good words out about us so that we can engender good will and gain additional customers. In other words, we often focus on positive behavior in the context of social networks. But just as positive behavior can be fostered through social networks, quitting behavior can be social too. When consumers decide to leave a company, even when no particularly negative word-of-mouth is present, that decision can still have a social rippling effect. Consider my recent quitting of Facebook, for instance. That decision was bolstered by seeing 36000+ consumers who also signed up to quit on QuitFacebookDay.com.

 

Exit

Image by Loui Loui from Flickr | CC 2.0

To help understand how this social quitting behavior works, I would like to discuss the findings from a rare academic study on this subject. Published in the Marketing Science Institute’s 2010 Working Paper Series, Irit Nitzan and Barak Libai from Tel Aviv University studied the effect of defection by friends on our own decisions to quit a company. If you are interested in the full report, you can purchase it directly from MSI.

Context

The study is based on the behavior of 853,643 customers of a major cellphone service provider in a Mediterranean country. The communication records and defection behavior of these consumers over the course of one year were examined. Social networks were constructed from the consumers’ call and text messaging records.

Main Findings

  • Quitting definitely has a social effect. Having an additional defecting friend increases one’s probability of leaving the same company by as much as 80%.
  • This social effect is the strongest right after the friend quits, and dissipates rather rapidly as time passes.
  • The stronger the social relationship one has with the quitting friend and the more similar one is to the friend, the stronger the social impact of quitting.
  • Heavy users and loyal customers who have been with the company for a long time and heavy users are more immune to the social effect of quitting from defecting friends.

What Does All This Mean to Practice?

  • Be proactive when a customer quits. If you have access to the customer’s social network (e.g., through online social networks such as Facebook), engage in preventive measures with the customer’s friends, such as sending an appreciation message to the friends, offering a special promotion, or obtaining feedback to address potential issues.
  • Try to respond fast, preferably within the first month, as the social effect of quitting is the strongest at the beginning.
  • Fostering customer loyalty does pay off. Loyal customers are much more resistance to forces that may lure them away from your company. This has been found to be the case from not only this study but also other academic studies as well.

Reference:
Irit Nitzan and Barak Libai (2010). Social Effects on Customer Retention Marketing Science Institute Working Paper Series 2010 Report No. 10-107

Averting Service Disasters – Quicken Loans the Sequel

Last week, I used my unpleasant mortgage application experience with Quicken Loans to demonstrate the danger of force locking in consumers instead of fostering loyalty. Since then, I have received some interesting communication from Quicken Loans. As a consumer, I emerged from the entire experience feeling OK again about Quicken Loans as a lender. While Quicken Loans had lost us as a customer for this mortgage because we already chose another lender, it successfully averted future negative word-of-mouth and ill will against the company. I detail my experience in this post as a case study of how companies can use social media to discover and address service failures and customer dissatisfaction.

Chronology
June 29 My unpleasant phone conversation with a Quicken Loans customer service representative
June 30 My blog on the experience as well as negative review on Epinions.com (note: consumers act fast when they feel unhappy)
July 1 Kelly at QuickenLoans commented on my Epinions.com review, offering to look into the problem and requesting more information from me
July 2 I emailed Kelly with full details of the incident
July 6 (after Independence Day Holiday weekend) I received a call as well as an email from Scott King, Lead Client Advocate at Quicken Loans. He had listened to my original conversation with their customer representative and read my blog. In the phone call and email, he apologized for our unpleasant experience and offered to introduce us to one of their best mortgage banker for a second chance.

The Response
You can read Kelly’s original comment on Epinions.com. With Scott’s permission, I am publishing his email response below: Continue reading “Averting Service Disasters – Quicken Loans the Sequel”

Lock in vs. Loyalty

Recently, while trying to obtain a mortgage, I spoke with a Quicken Loans customer service representative named Jorge (I omitted the last name here to save him some dignity). On the phone, I told him that we have not decided on a lender and that we wanted to get an idea of what Quicken Loans had to offer. Our intention was to shop around for the best deal AND service. Apparently, the fact that we are smart shoppers did not rest well with Mr. Jorge. He immediately asked us for a commitment that we are going to work with Quicken Loans if he were to spend any time working with us. When I told him that we cannot make such a commitment at this time, he refused to work with us. Needless to say, I finished my conversation with him quickly and crossed out Quicken Loans as a candidate lender.

What Mr. Jorge is trying to do is not uncommon in the business world — he is trying to lock in customers (or in my case, potential customers). Wireless companies do the same thing, by locking up our phones so that they can only be used with a specific provider. This attempt at locking in customers is not without a good reason. After all, today’s consumers are very fickle. Combined with the wealth of information we can find online and through social networks, we are given the power to choose the best service at the best price. So naturally companies want to create some kind of switching barrier so that we won’t go somewhere else.

 

Handcuffed
Image by mskogly | CC 2.0

The question is how effective such a switching barrier really is. The answer is: not very effective at all. Continue reading “Lock in vs. Loyalty”