Building Loyalty Program Partnerships Wisely

In less than two weeks from today, Plenti, a coalition loyalty program, will officially shut down. Created by American Express three years ago, Plenti had an impressive roster of partners, at one point including Macy’s, ExxonMobil, Rite Aid, Hulu, Expedia, among others. Despite its high-profile start, the failure of Plenti shows the many challenges associated with loyalty program partnerships. If you ever consider loyalty program partnerships, it is important that you do so strategically and judiciously.

The Business Case For Loyalty Program Partnerships

On the surface, loyalty program partnership is a great idea. It allows consumers to earn points from different businesses, making reward earning easier and more relevant to more consumers. This expands the potential market for the program. Running a joint program reduces the operational cost for each business. In the case of a dominant business-peripheral business partnership (such as the partnerships airline frequent flyer programs form with smaller businesses), the dominant business can make good money selling its program currency to its partners. Airlines, for example, are estimated to make between 1.5 and 2.5 cents per mile. With all these benefits, what could possibly go wrong? Continue reading “Building Loyalty Program Partnerships Wisely”

Reducing the Loyalty Gap

Although loyalty programs seem to be everywhere, many question whether such programs are indeed effective marketing tools. Strengthening the case for the skeptics, recent news report a restaurant that shut its doors in just a few months because it offered a ridiculously generous loyalty program. This is of course an extreme case. In reality, loyalty program providers can fairly easily keep program costs under control through smart program design involving the right combination of program currency, point ratio and reward structure.

Some loyalty program problems are not so straightforward however and can be much more subtle and challenging to deal with. One such example is the concern that loyalty programs foster loyalty to the program rather than to the company. That is, “I love Starbucks Rewards” may end up ringing more true than “I love Starbucks”. In the long run, this is bad news for the company because it makes the business overly dependent on the loyalty program. If a competitor decides to offer a more attractive program, customer attrition is likely to happen. What can businesses do to reduce this loyalty gap and make loyalty program members more loyal to the company rather than just to the program? I want to share with you some insights from a research project I conducted with a colleague in Belgium. Continue reading “Reducing the Loyalty Gap”

Providing Dynamic Feedback to Motivate Customers

 
Whether chasing after a premium tier in a loyalty program, trying to lose 20 pounds with a weight loss product, or vying for the top spot in the leaderboard of a mobile game, consumers often are doing more than just buying or using your product or service. They are also trying to achieve a small or big goal they have set for themselves. In such situations, it is to your advantage as a marketer to keep consumers on track with their goals and give them little nudges toward the finish line. One standard practice used by businesses is to give customers feedback on their progress. In a loyalty program, this could be in the form of a monthly statement telling them how many points they have in the account and/or how far away they are from making the next reward or tier. Research shows that when and how you offer such progress feedback can make a big difference in motivating consumers. You need to offer dynamic feedback based on where people on on their goal path.

Looking Forward or Looking Back

Imagine you are on a path between two points. You can look ahead and see how far you are from your destination point. As you make progress on the path, you will gradually close that distance to the destination until it becomes zero. Another way to assess your progress is to turn around and see how far you have come from your origination point. The more progress you make, the farther you will be from the origination point until you cover the entire length of the path. In a loyalty program context, a forward-looking progress feedback will be the equivalent of “you are x points/visits away from the next reward”, and a backward-looking progress feedback will look like “you have accumulated x points/visits so far” or “you have x points/visits in your account”. Which one of these is more effective? Research suggests that it depends on where people are along the path. When people are in the early stages of chasing their goals, they are still far away from the destination. At this point, they need reassurance that their actions are making an impact. Looking backwards at their achievement so far is likely to make that impact more visible, as going from 0 point to 100 points seems like a big difference (compared with going from 1000 points away to 900 points away from the goal). But as people move more toward the goal and are at later stages of their goal pursuit, they prefer to look forward to see a bigger impact of their actions. That is, they now want to see how they are closing the gap from being 200 points away to only 100 points away, instead of from 800 points to 900 points. The two researchers behind these findings, Koo and Fishbach, call this the small-area hypothesis, where paying attention to the smaller segment of the goal path motivates people more (see the linked document above if you want to read the original paper). Continue reading “Providing Dynamic Feedback to Motivate Customers”