Check-ins and Places

Launched in March 2009, Foursquare has established itself as a top player in location-based services. It allows users to “check in” to a business when they are at (or technically in the vincinity of) a business. In exchange, users earn fancy badges and mayorships, plus social benefits with their friends and other users located nearby. In the short one and a half years of its life, Foursquare has quickly signed up close to 3 million users. Following this surprising enthusiasm from consumers toward such location-based services, Twitter introduced its own location service earlier this year, where Twitter users can attach a location to their tweets. More recently, Facebook also introduced its own location-based service called “Facebook Places”. Through the Facebook iPhone app or mobile web interface (touch.facebook.com), users can check themselves and their friends into locations, and share that information with other Facebook friends.

Facebook Places

Photo by Flickr user Anthony Quintano | CC 2.0

Mobile Check-Ins and Loyalty

The fast growth of mobile check-in services has sprung other services that target more specifically at customer loyalty. Some of these services are built on existing mobile platforms such as Foursquare, and others use their own proprietary system. Here I would like to briefly mention three such services as examples of what is taking shape in the field of location-sensitive loyalty. Continue reading “Check-ins and Places”

Quitting Behavior is Social Too

When we talk about social networking or contagion effect, we are usually referring to getting good words out about us so that we can engender good will and gain additional customers. In other words, we often focus on positive behavior in the context of social networks. But just as positive behavior can be fostered through social networks, quitting behavior can be social too. When consumers decide to leave a company, even when no particularly negative word-of-mouth is present, that decision can still have a social rippling effect. Consider my recent quitting of Facebook, for instance. That decision was bolstered by seeing 36000+ consumers who also signed up to quit on QuitFacebookDay.com.

 

Exit

Image by Loui Loui from Flickr | CC 2.0

To help understand how this social quitting behavior works, I would like to discuss the findings from a rare academic study on this subject. Published in the Marketing Science Institute’s 2010 Working Paper Series, Irit Nitzan and Barak Libai from Tel Aviv University studied the effect of defection by friends on our own decisions to quit a company. If you are interested in the full report, you can purchase it directly from MSI.

Context

The study is based on the behavior of 853,643 customers of a major cellphone service provider in a Mediterranean country. The communication records and defection behavior of these consumers over the course of one year were examined. Social networks were constructed from the consumers’ call and text messaging records.

Main Findings

  • Quitting definitely has a social effect. Having an additional defecting friend increases one’s probability of leaving the same company by as much as 80%.
  • This social effect is the strongest right after the friend quits, and dissipates rather rapidly as time passes.
  • The stronger the social relationship one has with the quitting friend and the more similar one is to the friend, the stronger the social impact of quitting.
  • Heavy users and loyal customers who have been with the company for a long time and heavy users are more immune to the social effect of quitting from defecting friends.

What Does All This Mean to Practice?

  • Be proactive when a customer quits. If you have access to the customer’s social network (e.g., through online social networks such as Facebook), engage in preventive measures with the customer’s friends, such as sending an appreciation message to the friends, offering a special promotion, or obtaining feedback to address potential issues.
  • Try to respond fast, preferably within the first month, as the social effect of quitting is the strongest at the beginning.
  • Fostering customer loyalty does pay off. Loyal customers are much more resistance to forces that may lure them away from your company. This has been found to be the case from not only this study but also other academic studies as well.

Reference:
Irit Nitzan and Barak Libai (2010). Social Effects on Customer Retention Marketing Science Institute Working Paper Series 2010 Report No. 10-107

Averting Service Disasters – Quicken Loans the Sequel

Last week, I used my unpleasant mortgage application experience with Quicken Loans to demonstrate the danger of force locking in consumers instead of fostering loyalty. Since then, I have received some interesting communication from Quicken Loans. As a consumer, I emerged from the entire experience feeling OK again about Quicken Loans as a lender. While Quicken Loans had lost us as a customer for this mortgage because we already chose another lender, it successfully averted future negative word-of-mouth and ill will against the company. I detail my experience in this post as a case study of how companies can use social media to discover and address service failures and customer dissatisfaction.

Chronology
June 29 My unpleasant phone conversation with a Quicken Loans customer service representative
June 30 My blog on the experience as well as negative review on Epinions.com (note: consumers act fast when they feel unhappy)
July 1 Kelly at QuickenLoans commented on my Epinions.com review, offering to look into the problem and requesting more information from me
July 2 I emailed Kelly with full details of the incident
July 6 (after Independence Day Holiday weekend) I received a call as well as an email from Scott King, Lead Client Advocate at Quicken Loans. He had listened to my original conversation with their customer representative and read my blog. In the phone call and email, he apologized for our unpleasant experience and offered to introduce us to one of their best mortgage banker for a second chance.

The Response
You can read Kelly’s original comment on Epinions.com. With Scott’s permission, I am publishing his email response below: Continue reading “Averting Service Disasters – Quicken Loans the Sequel”